Indiana Law TV® is part of the Law TV® Network, a video driven legal directory that features quality educational videos from some of the state’s premier law firms.
The legal directory includes a comprehensive listing for each law firm, including how to reach the firm directly or on social media.
The complaint alleges the defendants are intentionally infringing on Subway's trademarks and operating their Sub Sub restaurant using Subway's...
Continue Reading
U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs of the District of Massachusetts entered a default judgment in favor of Jumpsource, partially granting their...
Continue Reading
Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote in January that Tesla CEO Elon Musk "wields unusually expansive managerial...
Continue Reading
Cozen O'Connor is moving into Little Rock with the hire of a former Arkansas attorney general, while Faegre Drinker's hire arrives from Troutman...
Continue Reading
"This new clemency initiative is a cornerstone of our administration's efforts to make New Jersey the state of second chances," Gov. Phil Murphy said...
Continue Reading
Amazon cited a growing trend among attorneys to corner niche markets by suing specific corporations by gleaning inside knowledge through expansive...
Continue Reading
“They thought there was an opportunity to build out a Big Four model that could practice law in the U.S. and the pitch was going to good firms in smaller markets and asking them to join,” said Indiana University Maurer School of Law professor Bill Henderson. “There was a shared service model that was quite […]
Current and former Tesla employees who worked at Tesla’s EV manufacturing facilities in Fremont and Lathrop, California, allege that supervisors and colleagues at these factories created a “racially hostile work environment” by routinely harassing African American, Hispanic and Latinx Tesla employees.
Indiana University and the University of Pennsylvania are the latest schools to adopt or consider temporary procedures for campus events and demonstrations.
The ruling was the first in which a social media company was unable to invoke immunity under Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act in a U.S. civil case over its advertising business, according to Australian billionaire Andrew Forrest.